Today, I got one of those questions asked of me ever-so-often — can I read what you write to make sure it’s accurate, before it goes to press?
I’ve tried various responses over the years. Here are some, with the last being what I most often do.
1) We’re both professionals doing our job. I believe that you are giving me factual important information and you can believe that I will do my best to present this story in an honest and accurate way. (So, the answer is no.)
2) Or you can take the long explanation approach — Well, our deadlines are st tight in journalism, if we let everyone we interview read the article and then try to listen to each one tell us what they think we should say, we’d never get it done.
3) Or you could say, actually, no professional journalists do not allow sources to read their articles before they go to press, but if you have some concerns about what we’ve discussed, please do tell me now, so we can make sure we both feel confident about this article. I had to do that today while talking with a physician about an award one of her colleagues was receiving. She told me her concerns. I understood and told her I would do the best to follow ethical journalistic practices — and I even offered her a very short synopsis of what I might say about a particular anecdote. That’s it, though, folks. You have to have confidence in your self and your sources, and then you need to be extra, extra careful about the tone and the honesty and the accuracy. It’s difficult to do that, which is why I believe experienced journalists are still needed in today’s society.
I’ll post the story here when it gets published.